answersLogoWhite

0

yes

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did Nazis do with captured enemy?

It generally depended on who was involved. Western European prisoners were treated much better than Eastern European prisoners. Eastern Europeans were most often killed or died of starvation. They were often made into slave laborers. Of the Western European prisoners, the British & Americans were treated better than the French, Belgian, Dutch or Italian (after Italy surrendered to the Allies) prisoners. Normally British & Americans were not killed or treated as slave laborers. The French, Belgian, Dutch & Italians were often sent to slave labor camps, and starved. Of the Germans that held prisoners, the SS were the worse offenders against prisoners, and the Luftwaffe (Air Force) treated their prisoners the best. Also civilian prisoners were treated worse than military prisoners.


How were the Soviet prisoners of war treated by the Nazis?

very badly, only slightly better than Jews were treated


Why did bhagat singh launched a hunger strike in the british jail?

As the british prisoners were treated better than the Indian political prisoners, bhagat singh and other prisoners launched a hunger strike advocating for the rights of prisoners and undertrials.


Why did bhagat singh and other prisoners launched the hunger strike in british jail?

The reason for the strike was that british murderers and thieves were treated better than Indian political prisoners,who,by law,were meant to be given better rights.


How were slaves in the Bahamas treated by their masters?

They were treated badly but generally better than most other slave communities in the New World.


What were the living conditions like in a pow camps in Canada?

The living conditions of the POW camps in Canada were said to be very good. The camps were in better condition than the army barracks. Canada has had more than 33,798 prisoners of war.


What enable you to survive Auschwitz?

Non-Jewish prisoners had a much better chance than Jewish prisoners. For example the British POWs were used as slave labour, but were treared much better with proper food rations and were not subject to random beatings. Soviet POWs were not treated much better that Jewish prisoners and almost all of them were worked to death. Political prisoners and criminals were generally given positions or responsibility, they were kapos, which meant that they would be able to take rations from others. For the Jewish inmates, who were the majority, their choices were limited. If they could get an indoor job, especially one in the 'Kanada' section, or in the kitchens they stood a better chance of not dieing from exposure or illness, but were still subject to 'selection' or random beatings. In general it was down to luck if they survived.


How did the Australians treat Japanese prisoners in World War 2?

The Australians treated the Japanese well in POW camps and gave them better food and water than the Japanese gave them, better shelter, medical attention, clothing and cigarettes.


Why did the icelanders immigrate to Canada?

Many icelandic citizens moved to Canada because of few reasons. Not much work, better health care, better education, better goverment, freedom. The Danish Kingdom that ruled over oss at the time treated oss with much cruelty at the time.


Adults in Canada treat children working on the farms in the 1800s?

Well... sometimes the children were treated horribly, but then as the economy grew it got better.


An inmate nearly fatally stabbed was on life support and the family not inormed civil rights violated to both inmate and family who can we complain to that will do something about it?

Well in my opinion, prisoners gave up their rights when they took someone else's away. What happened to the inmates' victims rights? Prisoners are treated better then Vietnam vets that have to live on the streets. Who cares about the rights of prisoners, they shouldn't have any. Why should the law work to help the prisoners always?


What led the death march?

Japanese Samurai thinking already considered a soldier that surrendered in battle to effectively be dead, so how did it matter how they treated them. That was also why the Japanese generally did not surrender, they expected to be treated no better by the Americans.