A lot of people prefer the sound of a record because they think it has a crisper and more smooth sound. But its really a personal preference. I personally like the sound of a record better, but i also own plenty of cds as well
Dvd is better than CD because the dvd can store more data than the CD
Yes. Of course iPods are better than CD players because iPods has lots of features.
Definately, Yes.
Front load players are generally considered to be better than top loading models
One cannot be said to really be "better" than the other. When a CD-R has been recorded to, it exhibits all the properties of a traditional CD-ROM. A pressed CD-ROM has a slightly higher theoretical lifespan, but real-world conditions place them at about equal rates of deterioration.
your better off getting the 52x cd's. These numbers are how fast the disc can be written onto, so the more the number, the faster the disc records onto.
Assuming you mean CD albums for artists. It's best to go with both! Internet sales through iTunes are probably better than CD. But people as myself LOVE to have a physical CD of the music.
You can send the records to a special vinyl to digital internet shop, they will burn your records on a cd. You can also buy a digital vinyl player and connect it to a computer with a cd burner and burn it to a cd
CD is better than harddisk because CD can be carried anywhere but hard disk can not
It can be erased and used again, instead of buying new CD-R's just erase a CD-RW and put the new data on it.
Not one that follows the Red Book (CD-DA standard...) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Book_(audio_CD_standard)
Ally Bank has a 2.80% 12 month CD.