not always
Mainly because we are naturally selfish and constantly claiming that we are in "dire" need of resources. 'We' meaning us Americans, some of us Americans.
Yes, with equally shared custody and if the parties have similar incomes.Yes, with equally shared custody and if the parties have similar incomes.Yes, with equally shared custody and if the parties have similar incomes.Yes, with equally shared custody and if the parties have similar incomes.
Yes, nonpolar covalent bonds are formed when the shared electrons between atoms are shared equally, resulting in a balanced distribution of electric charge. If the shared electrons are not equally shared, creating an unequal distribution of charge, a polar covalent bond is formed.
wealth is shared and distributed equally, especially for those who need it. aside from that, natural resources are divided properly and are not wasted.
Each person will receive 12000 if 60000 is equally shared between 5 people.
25 counters are shared equally by 10 ppl, how many counters per person
No, in a covalent bond the shared electrons may not always be shared equally between two atoms. Depending on the electronegativity of the atoms involved, one atom may attract the shared electrons more strongly, leading to a polar covalent bond where the electrons are not shared equally.
Covalent
no way
they can be shared but not equally.
While equitable access to resources is important, it may not always be feasible or effective to share all resources equally. Different situations may require varying distribution methods based on factors like need, merit, or sustainability. It's essential to consider fairness and inclusivity when determining resource allocation strategies.
prion