not always but most of the time yes.
people often achieve what they want by using force against government (because government has power and authority)
Both revolutions were motivated by the desire for freedom.
The Romanian revolution was very violent, while the Czech revolution was peaceful.
The Romanian revolution was violent, and the Czech revolution was not.
Up until the 20th century, violent revolutions were definitly heavily used. However, after media became more wide spread, non-violent revolution became more effective, and usually the more preferred solution. Protests, petitions, and other forms of civil resistance are now more used in most countries.
John F. Kennedy
The Romanian revolution was very violent, while the Czech revolution was peaceful.
The Romanian revolution was very violent, while the Czech revolution was peaceful.
The Romanian revolution was very violent, while the Czech revolution was peaceful.
The Romanian revolution was very violent, while the Czech revolution was peaceful.
((apex)) .The Romanian Revolution was very violent. <3 Kelsmo:)
It does not seem possible or probable that true democracy could be created in Central Asia without full scale violent revolutions.
There were some violent revolutions in Europe during the 19th and 20th centuries, such as the Russian Revolution and the French Revolution. While they were not exactly as Karl Marx predicted, they did result in significant social and political changes. Marx's theories did influence some revolutionary movements, but the outcomes were shaped by various factors beyond his predictions.