"Rice" and "rise" are homophones because they're pronounced the same but spelt differently. The third letter is only spelling difference, which "rice" uses C, but it pronounces the same as "rise" because that's a soft C as the following letter is E.
Another opinion: that may be true in some places, but where I live we pronounce 'rise' as 'rize', and I have never heard it said any other way even on US television. In my experience, they are NOT homophones.
I agree with that I don't pronounce rice (ris) the same as rise (riz)
No, rice and rise are not homophones. "Rice" is a grain used for food, while "rise" refers to moving upward or increasing.
The two homophones are "tied" (done with shoelaces) and "tide" (rise and fall of the sea).
Some homonyms of rice are "rise" (to move upwards) and "wrice" (a term used in chemistry).
The homophone for rise is "rice."
One homonym for rise is "rice." Both words sound the same but have different meanings.
Some homophones for "there" are "their" and "they're."
Some homonyms of rice are "rise" (to move upwards) and "wrice" (a term used in chemistry).
The two homophones are "tied" (done with shoelaces) and "tide" (rise and fall of the sea).
A type of Japanese rise!
Iranian use oil in the rice and Ireland people don't use oil in rice
"Kernel" and "colonel" are homophones, meaning they sound the same but have different meanings. "Kernel" typically refers to the softer, edible part of a seed or nut, while "colonel" is a military rank above a lieutenant colonel and below a brigadier general.
Martin P Rice has written: 'Valery Briusov and the rise of Russian symbolism'
Some homophones for "there" are "their" and "they're."
Homophones for "ware" are "wear" and "where."
The homophones for there are they're and their.
The homophones of "walk" are "wok" and "woke."
The homophones of "hello" are "hallo" and "hullo".
Ear and year are homophones, meaning they are pronounced the same but have different meanings and spellings.