0
I don't think this question can really be answered. It is so highly subjective that you will never find universal agreement. I believe that how (science) and why (religion) are extremely important questions to us as human beings, but there will be just as many who say that one matters more than the other, or that both are ultimately meaningless.
Another Perspective:
Some groups and individuals, from both communities, will always be in opposition. Generally however, science and religion are relevant to each other. They can (and do) co-exist and are mutually supportive. Religious questions and assertions stimulate scientific inquiry, and Scientific discovery (the result of inquiry) aids religion in its search for truth. However, This view does not imply that science and religion are always in agreement, especially in terms of how new knowledge is to be applied in our daily lives.
The Coordination of Science and Religion (COSAR) with the Truth of Reality is exquisitely embedded throughout The Urantia Book. The Urantia Papers emphasize that religion and science are not two antagonistic views of reality; they are views of two aspects of reality, those aspects being the personal and impersonal natures of God. The bumper sticker you may have seen lately "In the Beginning, God Created Evolution" demonstrates the increasing consciousness of our Cosmic Citizenship and a healthy respect for science (COSAR expressed on a bumper sticker). The COSAR Principle as described in Up Close and Personal with The Urantia Book - Expanded Edition addresses this with a great degree of satisfaction.
What else can I help you with?
Are religion and science mutually exclusive?
No. Religion is a faith based interpretation of that which is. Science is an observation based interpretation of that which is. They are both interpretations of that which is. Where they diverge is when faith and observation do not agree. In this case, either the faith needs to be refined or the observation needs to be refined or, as is often the case, both need to be refined, because they are still interpretations of the same thing - that which is.
Is religion more powerful science?
Religion is not a science.
Is science still relevant today?
Science is tremendously relevant today, probably more relevant than it has ever been. The world runs on technology, which can only be understood by means of science.
What is relationship between nature and science?
they have a mutually and dependant relationship nature helps science evolve and science needs to keep nature secure
What has the author R C Wallace written?
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
Is Hinduism a atheistic religion?
Atheism and religion are mutually exclusive. it follows that Hinduism is not a form of Atheism. Hindu's are polytheists which is by no means atheist.c.
When did Albert Einstein say 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
How can science be used in all science?
science is science and therefore must be relevant to the entirety of its self
Who said 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.
Is computer science relevant?
yes
How were science and religion linked in ancient times?
God created the world including science, hence science and religion are interconnected.
Is religion an art or science?
It is an art as it can not be a science.
