0
What else can I help you with?
Why do they use elephants in animal testing?
I am not aware of any program that uses elephants in animal-related experiments. Elephants maintained in zoos or animal sanctuaries are often monitored extensively via physical exams, blood tests and non-invasive images so that scientists can better understand wild elephants, but that is the extent of testing on elephants.
What you can achieve from animal testing?
The new medicines are not available without animal testing. It is better to sacrifise animal than human. There is a lot of sadness in every family for a lost member...
Is animal testing cruel?
No. Animal testing is a necessary part of research. Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not existed, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today. When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs: Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort. Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible. Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner. Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Remember, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences. This is no more flawed than a person trying to rescue and free animals, only to unknowingly and unintentionally kill them. It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.
Why dont people use animal testing alternatives?
There is no alternative. Every day, thousands of peopleare saved from painful diseases. However, we simply do not have alternative methods of testing. Until we have a better system, we must use animal testing.
How is animal testing inhumane?
There are pro's and cons to animal testing. It can help discover life saving treatments for humans and other animals. However, it is sometimes said that animal testing is inhumane because the animals are in pain, or are not taken care of. However, there are government standards on research labs. The animals do not feel pain, and even though they may die eventually, they often live as long as a normal household pet.
How many times has aniamal testing fail?
Well its hard to say but they started animal testing in 1960-1970 and in many diffrent contrys so animal testing has been wrong over 10,569 times. so u better check that their a 100% sure that their product is safe
Is Animism wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
Is animal testing wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
Finally what is conclusion for animal testing should be band?
In conclusion, animal testing should be banned due to ethical concerns surrounding the treatment of sentient beings, the availability of alternative research methods, and the questionable applicability of results from animal models to human health. Additionally, advancements in technology, such as in vitro testing and computer simulations, provide more humane and often more relevant approaches to research. The moral imperative to protect animals, combined with the potential for better scientific outcomes, strongly supports the case for ending animal testing.
Which Step of technological design is represented by the situation scientists at a university develop a drink that replaces lost electrolytes better than water?
solution assessment
How can you find out which antibiotic will work better against the infection?
you can find out by testing each one and comming up with the best solution possible to fit that person's need
Does the cystic fibrosis foundation fund animal testing?
Yes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation does support research that may involve animal testing as part of the development of new therapies for cystic fibrosis. This research aims to better understand the disease and evaluate the efficacy and safety of potential treatments. The foundation prioritizes ethical research practices and works to ensure that any animal testing is conducted in compliance with regulations and standards.
