Reptiles are considered to be an adapted version of some dinosaurs. Since snakes are retails then it should also be consider a (adapted) dinosaur.But snakes in particular are not usually known (or mentioned) as an (adapted) dinosaur.
There were ancestors of snakes that had feet during the time of the dinosaurs. But the mere fact that they had feet meant that they would be considered snakes. Instead they were more like modern lizards. The first snakes appeared during the Cretaceous period when dinosaurs still dominated the earth.
Both snakes and dinosaurs are diapsid reptiles. Dinosaurs, however, are archosaurs. Snakes are squamates.
No. Snakes are in the lepidosaur branch of reptiles while dinosaurs are from the archosaur branch.
No. The tuatara is more closely related to lizards and snakes than it is to dinosaurs.
No. Turtle are from a branch of reptiles completely separate from dinosaurs.
Snakes are reptiles.
Snakes appeared about 70 million years ago, just before the dinosaurs died out. Although snakes were huge then, the biggest recorded was 36ft long. Remember, any snake that lives on land that is longer than 50 ft is too big to move and breathe.
Yes. Snakes first appeared in the Cretaceous period, the third and last period of the age of the dinosaurs.
pteranodns werent dinosaurs they were pterosaurs because dinosaurs could not fly.
alligators, crocadilles, snakes, reptiles,
Black snakes are considered a as consumers because they eat meat.
Yes. All birds are direct descendants of dinosaurs and are considered by many to be dinosaurs.