Yes, you can lose a stock, and you can lose a bond, but bonds are harder to lose, and can never decrease in value.
Stocks are considered much more liquid than bonds. This is because stocks are riskier and the value of the stock is determined by the present market.
Common stock is riskier than bonds. Common stock fluctuates in price as a matter of course. Bonds tell you What they will pay, When they will pay it and For How Long they will pay it. Assuming the company doesn't go into default, bonds are safe. (The risk of bonds is that companies DO go into default, which is why bonds are rated.)
Often they don't, and when they do it is because equity investment is riskier (given that creditors have, by default, the overriding claim over the assets of the relevant firm).
Because the price of a stock varies every minute of a trading day and it may go up or down based on the market sentiment and the company's performance. Your investment may lose value heavily in case of a market crash and hence they are much riskier when compared to Saving money in a bank
In finance, risk is generally defined as the possibility of loss or achieving a lower return than expected on an investment. Keeping money in a bank is considered safer than stocks and bonds due to the fact that bank deposits are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 and the nominal amount of savings in a bank will not decline. Investors in stocks and bonds are subject to a wide variety of macroeconomic risks which may impair the value of their investment. To fully evaluate the difference in risk between bank deposits versus stocks and bonds, it is necessary to consider the time frame of the respective investments. If safety of principal is of paramount importance and the savings are likely to be needed in the near future to pay bills, a bank is the best and safest place to keep savings. Savings invested for the long term in stocks and bonds have historically far outperformed the return earned on bank savings. Investment expert Warren Buffett said recently that bank savers are suffering a "brutal" erosion of purchasing power on savings kept in the bank due to inflation and ultra low interest rates.
Stocks are considered much more liquid than bonds. This is because stocks are riskier and the value of the stock is determined by the present market.
Common stock is riskier than bonds. Common stock fluctuates in price as a matter of course. Bonds tell you What they will pay, When they will pay it and For How Long they will pay it. Assuming the company doesn't go into default, bonds are safe. (The risk of bonds is that companies DO go into default, which is why bonds are rated.)
Often they don't, and when they do it is because equity investment is riskier (given that creditors have, by default, the overriding claim over the assets of the relevant firm).
A balanced investment portfolio would include both stocks and bonds as well as cash and mutual fund. The mix would depend on your investment objectives and tolerence for risk. If you had to pick just one investment, it would depend on how liquid you want your funds and how much risk you are willing to take. Stocks are riskier and therefore give a higher expected return in the long term. Also it is important to take into consideration your stage in life, older folks, with little income, should stay conservative and stick to bonds, while younger people can assume more risk.
Long term CD accounts offer and safe and secure way to invest money. Stocks and bonds are more riskier than CD's and in some cases offer no return on your investment, and may even cause you to loose your entire investment. Careful research will need to be conducted before choosing any type of investment.
Bonds and stocks serve different purposes to the investor, and ideally you should buy both. Advantage of investment-grade bonds: the issuer is committed to paying you a stated amount of money on a stated date. The disadvantage is your return is limited to the agreed-on amount. Advantage of stocks: potentially unlimited return on your investment. The disadvantage is there are no guaranteed returns with stocks; you could potentially lose everything you invested in them. Speculative-grade bonds, or "junk bonds," have a risk/reward system more like stocks than investment-grade bonds.
Because the price of a stock varies every minute of a trading day and it may go up or down based on the market sentiment and the company's performance. Your investment may lose value heavily in case of a market crash and hence they are much riskier when compared to Saving money in a bank
In finance, risk is generally defined as the possibility of loss or achieving a lower return than expected on an investment. Keeping money in a bank is considered safer than stocks and bonds due to the fact that bank deposits are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 and the nominal amount of savings in a bank will not decline. Investors in stocks and bonds are subject to a wide variety of macroeconomic risks which may impair the value of their investment. To fully evaluate the difference in risk between bank deposits versus stocks and bonds, it is necessary to consider the time frame of the respective investments. If safety of principal is of paramount importance and the savings are likely to be needed in the near future to pay bills, a bank is the best and safest place to keep savings. Savings invested for the long term in stocks and bonds have historically far outperformed the return earned on bank savings. Investment expert Warren Buffett said recently that bank savers are suffering a "brutal" erosion of purchasing power on savings kept in the bank due to inflation and ultra low interest rates.
These types of investments do work, but they are typically high-risk, high-reward investments that are riskier than bonds and stocks. Learn more about the process at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_exchange_market.
Investment becomes costlier, when funds are invested in a company with hollow promises and returns are thus meagre, in comparison to investments in a company of repute. Whereas savings in bank FD or LIC policies are far less riskier and the return or outcome is well know at the time of investment itself.
There are three.1. What they are: Bonds are basically a loan of money to a company. Stocks denote partial ownership in the company.2. Rate of return: Stocks offer a potentially higher rate of return because they're riskier than bonds are. (The "high yield" or "junk" bond has returns similar to stocks, but it's about as risky as stock.)3. If the company defaults, bondholders are paid in full before stockholders get anything.That's corporate bond basics. There are also municipal bonds--those issued by a government body from state level down to agencies of city governments--and Treasuries, which are issued by the federal government.
It is not a 100% safe but it is comparatively safer than investing in stocks. The main risk associated with investing in bonds is the fact that, if the bond issuer goes bankrupt, our money is gone. Apart from this, there is no major risk to our investment (Principal) part in bond investments.