Stone is a naturally produced resource but it takes thousands of years to form so it is considered to be non-renewable.
it is a nonrenewable
it's difficult to asertain with a completely exemplary asertion
Technically, yes--in human years, no.
Soil is non renewable because it takes thousands of years for stone and decaying materials to intertwine to create the ground we walk on.
Soil is non renewable because it takes thousands of years for stone and decaying materials to intertwine to create the ground we walk on.
Stone is considered a non-renewable resource because it forms over millions of years through geological processes. Once extracted and used, it cannot be replenished within a human timescale. While it is abundant in nature, its extraction and use can have significant environmental impacts, making sustainable management important.
They mainly used stone and the early version of bricks; they were the most reliable and renewable sources back then!
it is renewable
Eggs are renewable resources.
stones are like wood, they break and they break and they may come back if we treat it and mend it back together, but at this time, I don't think that you can actually use stone that you basicly broke for the same purpose again, so I'll have to say no.
it is renewable
renewable