Personally, I'm not a fan of either one, but I can at least appreciate some of the humour which accompanies the material released by System of a Down.
Again, this is a matter of pure opinion. As for my personal opinion, I really don't like either one, but find In Flames to be slightly more tolerable than Disturbed.
Well, I take it you like disturbed more, because you misspelled Metallica, but it's Metallica ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- statistically, metallica is better, and personally, metallica is better. of course metallica has the best into but Disturbed is better because of the amount of people that know about Disturbed!!! depends on your style Metallica is a different style of metal than disturbed. Personally I think Disturbed is better mostly because the vocals are way better than metallica and metallica has the long intro which I think are boring
marking system is better than grading system because for intell students
Yes, but Disturbed blows both of those off the map
Historically Down would be better than Armagh, but at certain times Armagh can be better than Down, so it depends on your perspective.
below
How much better than what?
You don't. At least alternative rock is better for them than screamo emo music.
no
no
Hands down, Lebron is a much better Basketball player than Kobe.
Shipwrecks are better preserved in deeper water because deeper waters have stable temperatures, lower oxygen levels, and reduced light, which slows down the decay process. Also, deep-water environments are less disturbed by natural phenomena like currents and waves, which can break down wrecks in shallower waters.