yes
a textbook is considered as a secondary source. for example, in many social studies textbook it stars or quotes a primary source, it is usually in italic letters.
A secondary source, such as a textbook or analysis, is generally not considered a primary source.
It was written after the events already took place.
Yes, a history textbook on the events of World War II is considered a secondary source. It analyzes, interprets, and summarizes information from primary sources, such as letters, diaries, and official documents from the time. Secondary sources provide context and commentary, allowing readers to understand the significance and impact of historical events.
a textbook, encyclopedia or an interpretation of a diary/ photo unless it is from that specific time period it is a secondary source
Yes, a history textbook is a common secondary source because it is written by a scholar or researcher who has compiled information from various primary sources to create a comprehensive overview of a historical topic. The textbook provides analysis, interpretation, and context to help readers understand the subject matter.
A primary source is a firsthand account or original document created during the time period being studied, such as a diary or speech. A secondary source interprets or analyzes primary sources, offering commentary or analysis, like a history textbook or scholarly article.
Primary would be the first of whatever you're talking about, and secondary would be the second or the once-removed whatever it is. For example, a primary source of research would be something like a diary or letter, which would be a first-line information source - a secondary source would be a textbook reporting about what the person described in the letter or diary.
This is a secondary source.
A secondary source is any document or record that analyzes, interprets, or summarizes primary sources. For example, a history textbook discussing events from World War II is a secondary source, as it relies on primary materials such as letters, photographs, and official documents from that time. Other examples include articles, biographies, and documentaries that provide commentary or analysis of primary data.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
A primary text is a text where the source was personal or direct. For example, a primary text would be an anecdote or autobiography. Quoting a speech directly, or describing an experience that the writer experienced THEMSELF would also be classified as a primary text. A secondary text ideally makes reference to a primary text. A history textbook may directly relay events in history (primary text), but a project based on the readings of this textbook would be a secondary text. Going even further, an essay based on the project, based on the textbook, based on actual events in history should be classified as perhaps a "tertiary" text. However, it is simply termed "secondary". A secondary text is any text that is not directly from the source.