yes
a textbook is considered as a secondary source. for example, in many social studies textbook it stars or quotes a primary source, it is usually in italic letters.
A secondary source, such as a textbook or analysis, is generally not considered a primary source.
It was written after the events already took place.
a textbook, encyclopedia or an interpretation of a diary/ photo unless it is from that specific time period it is a secondary source
Yes, a history textbook is a common secondary source because it is written by a scholar or researcher who has compiled information from various primary sources to create a comprehensive overview of a historical topic. The textbook provides analysis, interpretation, and context to help readers understand the subject matter.
A primary source is a firsthand account or original document created during the time period being studied, such as a diary or speech. A secondary source interprets or analyzes primary sources, offering commentary or analysis, like a history textbook or scholarly article.
This is a secondary source.
Primary would be the first of whatever you're talking about, and secondary would be the second or the once-removed whatever it is. For example, a primary source of research would be something like a diary or letter, which would be a first-line information source - a secondary source would be a textbook reporting about what the person described in the letter or diary.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
It is a secondary source.
secondary
Secondary source