They are a combination: Their features and expressions are based off of real life characters...CGI technology was used to model the virtual characters. See the related links for an image about how it was done.
It depends on which avatar you're thinking about. The Na'vi are not real and niether are the "human" na'vi that people can go into. But avatars such as characters on a computer game are real.
navi negi
Yes it is :)
Navi leaves link at the end, why else would he get a different fairy in the next one. Navi leaves him because he is no a real kakiri child
Image is a real world picture while graphics is a computer generated picture
09 is way better it has better graphics the people look real and the controls are amazing
In some scenes yes but most of the time it was all graphics. Like when he was talking ,graphics.
XPression Real Time graphics was built to be a 3D graphics platform. The benefits of XPression is that it seamlessly integrates 2 and 3D clips and workflows into 3D animation. This program is great for news programs, sports shows, and any company looking to have crisp 3D graphics.
just for design or to make it look cooler no real reason.
Avatar is a film. Mostly created with computer graphics. It is fantasy.
An avatar body is grown by mixing Na'vi DNA with a specific human's DNA. Only that human (or someone with almost identical DNA like a twin) can neurally connect to the avatar body. Avatars are not real. It was a fantasy movie. So there is no relationship between the two.
Machinima uses real-time three-dimensional computer graphics for cinematography. It uses game engines to create the 3-D graphics. This is still a new technology.