No, they are capitalists. Socialism and capitalism are diametrically opposed.
No: they support capitalism (wages system, production for profit, lass ownership) just as much as the republicans do. Socialism is a classless stateless society based on production for use.
Absolutely not. Hitler was a National Socialist, which is a right wing party. His main opponents were the Social Democrats.
Similar, although the GB Labour party still describes itself as 'Democratic Socialist' the Democrats in the USA have Liberals and moderate conservatives amonsgt their ranks and would never describe themselves as Socialist.
A danish political party that is currently the 2nd largest party. It emerged from the late 19th century socialist movement. A danish political party that is currently the 2nd largest party. It emerged from the late 19th century socialist movement.
The Soviet Union was communist. Spain, Italy, and Germany were socialist, fascist dictatorships. The rest were democracies or monarchies. Japan was an imperial empire.
He doesn't. That is a myth spread by his political opponents. While the president believes, as many Democrats do, that the government has a role in helping its poorest citizens, he is not a socialist, nor have he ever been.
Kinda, Democrats belive in abortion which is a fundamental problem with the Church because they are pro-choice. Their community and socialist standings are more in Line with Catholic teachings than Republicans
In 1917, under the 65th United States Congress, the Democrat party controlled the U.S. Senate, and a coalition - includingProgressives and Socialist party Rep. Meyer London gave the Democrats a majority in the House.
The Democrats hold a majority in the Senate.
Neither: it is capitalist.
Democrats have emphasized?
There are no socialist countries in Europe.
The previous answer was "Because the Republicans and Democrats had already adopted the Socialist program, and he had no more work to do." If that were true, then the U.S. wouldn't have entered World War II, which was not "The Good War", but rather a war to see which nation would be the strongest over all other nations.He never really "quit":"In 1955, he resigned his official posts in the Socialist party, but he remained its chief spokesman until shortly before his death."Read more: norman-thomas