Yes. Plants need soil in which to grow, water, and carbon dioxide. Aerobic organisms need water and oxygen and nutrients. These are just a couple of examples of relationships between living things and non-lving things.
Living and nonliving both are things.Both of these things are present in our environment.Living things are god made things while nonliving things are man made things which are god made.Both depends on them.
Yes, there are relationships between living and nonliving things. For example: Without water (which is a nonliving thing) we and water animals can't survive.
Living things are living, breathing, eating organisms that take and contribute to their ecosystem. Nonliving things do not breathe, eat, or need water (e.g., a rock). A dead organism is a once-living creature that has become a nonliving thing.
No...otherwise it would be considered living!
yguigvyu
Yes there are relationship between the living and non-living world
Living things eat, breathe, sleep, drink water and produce offspring. Non-living things do not do any of these things. Non-living things are rocks, sand, air and water.
A waterfall is nonliving because water is not a living thing.
living things are plants, animals,non living things are table any matrials etc...
The living goldfish swims around in a non-living bowl. The living rose bush clings to the non-living trellis
living things: fish, plankton, coral, seaweed, any organism non-living things: water, salt, rocks, litter, mud, sand
they don't live rad9999 checking in: living things need the following processes to be considered alive. movement , reproduction , sensitivity , nutrition , excretion , respire and growth . if its nonliving it doesn't do any of this.