During the time, you're pushing it, the forces are unbalanced. Once you stop, they are balanced. Unbalanced forces result in a change in motion. Balanced forces produce no change.
It's kind of funny that you're pushing your box 1800 miles per hour, though! :)
When two or more forces act on an object, if the sum (vector sum) of the forces is zero, the forces are said to be balanced. Otherwise the forces are unbalanced. According to Newton's Second Law, an unbalanced force will cause an acceleration.
Doesn't matter Balanced Force would mean the object is traveling at a constant velocity due to Newton's First Law of Motion (Law of Inertia) Unbalenced Force would mean the object is accelerating (or decellerating) due to Newton's Second Law of Motion
Yes, due to momentum. For example, an object traveling in space might have no forces acting on it but still be moving through space. However, the question might also be asked, how did this object start moving in the first place? If the object was created in a stationary state, then unbalanced forces would have to act upon it to get it moving. The object would have to have been created while moving in order to get it to move without unbalanced forces acting upon it.
Yes, whether an object will move or stay stationary in its place, or move in contant velocity depends on the NET force that is acting on it. * If there is a balanced force, ( all forces cancel each other out) , then the object will not move, or stay moving at a constant velocity (a=0) * If there is an unbalanced force, (forces donot cancel), then the object will move.
No, that's not the way our Universe works. I suggest do some reading on Newton's Second Law - for instance, in the Wikipedia. Briefly, you do NOT need a NET force to keep an object moving. With a net force of zero (i.e., balanced forces): * A stationary object will remain stationary * A moving object will continue moving, at constant velocity.
2 Forces are unbalanced when an object that is not moving starts moving or changes speed or direction. Balanced forces are the opposite they are where an object that is not moving stays still or an object that is moving stays at a constant pace.
If the vector sum of forces on an object is zero, the forces are said to be balanced. Otherwise they are said to be unbalanced. Unbalanced forces will cause an acceleration, according to Newton's Second Law (a = F/m, where F is the net force, that is, the vector sum of all forces acting on the object).
When two or more forces act on an object, if the sum (vector sum) of the forces is zero, the forces are said to be balanced. Otherwise the forces are unbalanced. According to Newton's Second Law, an unbalanced force will cause an acceleration.
Anything that induces acceleration. As found in Newton's second law F=ma. There must be an acceleration when an unbalanced force is present. So anything that gets something moving or makes it move faster or slower. If it is moving at a constant rate then it doesn't count. For instance when I push a box to get it to move; when it starts moving there is an unbalanced force. When I kick a ball, the second it starts moving, it shows there is an unbalanced force present. I think you get the idea from here...=============================There is no such thing as "an unbalanced force". A single force by itself is notbalanced or unbalanced.A group of two or more forces is balanced if all the individual forces in the groupadd up to zero. Example: You push a shopping cart forward, while I push it backward.A group of two or more forces is unbalanced if all the individual forces in the groupdon't add up to zero. Example: You push a shopping cart forward while a mousepushes it backward.
Newton's first law, which states that a body at rest remains at rest and a body in motion remains in motion at constant velocity in a straight line unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
Doesn't matter Balanced Force would mean the object is traveling at a constant velocity due to Newton's First Law of Motion (Law of Inertia) Unbalenced Force would mean the object is accelerating (or decellerating) due to Newton's Second Law of Motion
Yes, due to momentum. For example, an object traveling in space might have no forces acting on it but still be moving through space. However, the question might also be asked, how did this object start moving in the first place? If the object was created in a stationary state, then unbalanced forces would have to act upon it to get it moving. The object would have to have been created while moving in order to get it to move without unbalanced forces acting upon it.
Yes, whether an object will move or stay stationary in its place, or move in contant velocity depends on the NET force that is acting on it. * If there is a balanced force, ( all forces cancel each other out) , then the object will not move, or stay moving at a constant velocity (a=0) * If there is an unbalanced force, (forces donot cancel), then the object will move.
A hill is not a force, balanced or otherwise. According to Newton's Second Law, if there is any unbalanced force on an object, the object accelerates - its velocity changes.
If the parachutist is just falling down vertically, he is falling because of the unbalance force. Gravity is pulling him down. Gravity is stronger than the air resistance that is "keeping him up". The two unbalanced forces: gravity & air resistance. Because they are imbalance, he is accelerating towards the Earth's surface at 9.8 meters per second.
No, that's not the way our Universe works. I suggest do some reading on Newton's Second Law - for instance, in the Wikipedia. Briefly, you do NOT need a NET force to keep an object moving. With a net force of zero (i.e., balanced forces): * A stationary object will remain stationary * A moving object will continue moving, at constant velocity.
Basically, as a body accelerates, the forces acting upon it are unbalanced. However, as one reaches uniform speed (constant speed) you are no longer accelerating, so the forces acting upon the bike are now balanced. Newton's second law of motion states that when something is moving, it will continue to move at the same velocity until another force is applied (inertia). Because of this, the bike will be moving "on its own" after you stop peddling, so there is less need to pedal.