Yes.
Yes, scientific theories can be rejected if new evidence emerges that contradicts them or if they are no longer able to explain observed phenomena. The process of science involves testing and refining theories based on experimental results and observations, and theories can be revised or replaced as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
Science is based around experimentation and then creating a theory to support the evidence found through your experiment. Therefore with out experiments you have no science.
Induction is a method of reasoning that involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. It is used to infer patterns or conclusions from specific instances or cases. In science, induction is utilized to formulate hypotheses or theories based on experimental data and observations.
Authority is based on experimental outcomes. When two competing theories predict different outcomes for an experiment, the experiment is conducted and one (or both) theories are demolished. The only authority is the result of methodological testing, NOT simply the say-so of some scientist or some divine revelation. You yourself may overturn any current scientific theory simply by demonstrating, through a properly controlled experiment, why the prevailing theory is wrong.
There are countless stories. Science is the only way to get rational evidence based information. The rest are only myths.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.
science is based on evidence
A wide range of observations and experimental results refers to the diverse findings across various scientific disciplines that are grounded in empirical evidence. These results are subject to change as new evidence emerges, highlighting the dynamic nature of scientific inquiry. This adaptability allows science to refine theories and improve our understanding of natural phenomena. Such a process exemplifies the iterative nature of scientific research, where conclusions are continually tested and re-evaluated.
Democritus did not have experimental evidence to support his idea of the atom. Instead, his idea was based on philosophical reasoning and speculation.
Science that is at the frontier of all knowledge based on experimental testing.
The three roots of science evolution are empirical observations and experimentation, logical reasoning and critical thinking, and the constant revision of theories based on new evidence and data.
It's called a theory.