Want this question answered?
Any kind except X-ray observations.
maybe cuz of ultraviolet radiation (mars)
Johann Wilhelm Ritter invented ultraviolet light
Anything opaque that can block light will block ultraviolet rays. Wearing a shirt will keep your back from getting sunburned by ultraviolet rays.
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
Kamal Younan Farag has written: 'Optical and ultraviolet observations towards the Pleiades cluster'
Leonard Francis Yntema has written: 'Observations on the rare earths' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Ultraviolet spectra, Yttrium
Any single observation may or may not be accurate. If you compare observations you can reduce the chance of observational error.
Because radiation at those wavelengths is absorbed in the atmosphere, and very little of it ever reaches the ground. Operated on the ground, those telescopes would see almost nothing.
Coca Cola
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet light. That's why it's called so.
no, because ultraviolet rays are just above seeing and with ultraviolet lights, you see a more violet color.
ultraviolet light or radiation of any kind
the answer is yes.Butterflies have average eyesight. They do have one advantage over most other insects in that they can see colour. Their colour vision, however, is shifted towards the ultraviolet end of the spectrum.^this means that butterflies can see ultraviolet light
No. They can not see in ultraviolet light. They are known to glow when exposed to ultraviolet light, though.
The Ultraviolet Catastrophe was created in 1998.