no
no
no
no
no
In any nation with welfare and/or subsidy payments programs, they should be reviewed for relevancy before they are funded again. This is because the programs may not be effective or there may be waste or corruption in the programs. This type of review should be done with any government payment programs in all areas of government.
Generally speaking, all government tax collecting policies and government expenditures need to be reviewed to make sure there is no waste, and that tax laws are fair. Welfare payments as well as defense expenditures all need to be reviewed as often as possible. This applies to South Africa and all countries.
The welfare of the people should be an important concern for any government.
Any Cyst should be evaluated by your Ob/Gyn and maybe even have the result reviewed by an oncologist. Not all cysts are harmful, but all should be cautiously, reviewed.
Any purchase of real estate should be supervised by an attorney who specializes in real estate law.
In 2017, it would be prudent to review welfare and subsidy programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to ensure they effectively address poverty and support low-income families. Additionally, considering the rising cost of healthcare, expanding subsidies for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act could greatly benefit those struggling with medical expenses. Furthermore, assessing the impact of housing assistance programs could help address the ongoing housing crisis in many regions.
Yes, any resident of the household should be added to the policy.
No. Under the "General Welfare Doctrine", any government welfare payments are not included in taxable income.