yes, there are conclusions in narratives...
This question is too vague. We could talk about first-person narratives, third-person narratives and third-person omniscient narratives. We could talk about narratives written in the past tense and those written in the present tense and those which cannot make up their minds. We could talk about quest-type narratives, or mystery-type narratives, or romance-type narratives, or conflict-type narratives. We could distinguish between mundane narratives, epic narratives, and mythic narratives. There are lots of possibilities here.
Writers write narratives.
Why are there contradictions in the biblical narratives?
Yes, conclusions related to historical events often rely on subjective evaluations of existing evidence, as historians interpret artifacts, documents, and testimonies through their own perspectives and biases. Additionally, the availability and reliability of sources can vary, leading to differing interpretations. While rigorous methodologies can help mitigate subjectivity, complete objectivity is challenging in the study of history. Thus, conclusions are often influenced by the historian's context and the prevailing narratives of their time.
Y. Schmidhauser has written: 'Otto Mueller' -- subject(s): Biography, World War, 1939-1945, Russian Germans, Personal narratives, Russian, Personal narratives, German, Personal narratives, Russian German, German Personal narratives, Russian Personal narratives, Russian German Personal narratives
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Because that's what they are interested in! When they are able to write narratives, they can also feel other's which is enjoyable for them.
It is essential to study narratives for us to learn from others culture
The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives was created in 1974.
Historians may draw different conclusions about the same event due to varying interpretations of evidence, differing perspectives influenced by their backgrounds or ideologies, and the availability of sources. Additionally, the context in which historians work can shape their analyses, leading to emphasis on different aspects of an event. The subjective nature of historical interpretation means that multiple narratives can coexist, reflecting the complexity of human experiences.
Give me precepts and I'll give you conclusions.
That's usually "epic narratives." The answer is "sagas."