Yes.
Big animals can be more dangerous than small animals due to their size and strength, which can cause more harm in an attack. However, the level of danger also depends on the animal's behavior, habitat, and prey or predator status. It's important to respect all animals and their potential danger.
In the rainforest, there are generally more small animals than big animals. This is because small animals often have adaptations that help them navigate the dense vegetation and find food more easily than larger animals. Small animals also tend to reproduce more quickly, leading to a higher population density overall.
Some big, some small, more big ones than smll ones.
yes because they actually get more food
Some people think that seeds are more "moral" to experiment with than small animals and insects.
They raised more animals
They raised more animals
Yes. Wind transports small particles more easily than large ones. Large particles are more likely to be left behind while small particles tend to be transported further than larger ones.
Large planets have more gravity than smaller ones
Generally, small tornadoes do less damage than large ones, but some small tornadoes have been very destructive.
Technically yes, but only because there are more small cities for tornadoes to hit.
Yes, small fossils are generally more common than big ones. Small fossils are more easily preserved and less likely to be destroyed over time compared to larger fossils, making them more abundant in the fossil record. Additionally, the small size of some organisms may contribute to their higher numbers in the fossil record.