Yes. If it goes to a grand jury, it must be decided by the grand jury whether or not to indict before a criminal court case is even scheduled. If the grand jury does not agree to indict, there will be no court case.
Yes, typically witnesses are called to testify before a grand jury prior to the defendant's trial date. The purpose of the grand jury is to evaluate the evidence and determine whether there is sufficient cause to bring charges against the defendant. The witness testimony is used to gather information and establish probable cause for the charges.
Jurisdiction DIRECTLY limits A. When a case may be heard B. Who may decide a case C. How many witnesses may be called by the defendant D. The number of times a case may be heard B. Who may decide a case.
This is a true statement. In court the defendant will be represented by counsel and may choose to testify, or not.
Naomi who? Where?
An information is where the district attorney or prosecutor charges a defendant of some crime or crimes, whereas an indictment is where the a defendant is charged after a grand jury has heard the evidence. The evidence usually meets a certain standard such as legally sufficient standard or probable cause.
In civil court, the Rules of Civil Procedure are followed, either the State rules or the federal rules if the court is federal. One person brings a lawsuit, serving a summons on the defendant, then the defendant has a certain period of time to ANSWER (often 20 days). Motions are made and then the matter is heard before the court (either a Bench Trial or a Jury Trial), or the parties can settle before the case is heard in the court.
The witness testified about what she heard the defendant say.
Yes, there are cases that I heard about this. This is possible.
Neither one comes before the other. The two are opposites of one another. A "true bill" is a valid indictment of a defendant voted on and handed down by a Grand Jury. A "no true bill" is exactly the opposite. The GJ heard the presentment and declined to indict, therefore making its finding of "no true bill" of indictment.
Jehovah's Witnesses have often had their rights violated by various Governments or their various entities. Jehovah's Witnesses have appealed to the Court Systems to protect their rights; even taking matters to the Supreme Court; to the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC); and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Of the 49 cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses that have been heard by the ECHR, we have won all except 2 cases. But then in 2011, one of the cases we lost, was overturned by it's Grand Chamber of 17 judges; with a vote of 16 to 1 in favor of Jehovah's Witnesses. All of the cases brought before such legal entities by Jehovah's Witnesses have helped refine and establish the human and legal rights of all peoples. This is a contribution to the welfare of all earth's citizens.
The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution is important for a number of reasons. One of the rights with the sixth Amendment related to criminal prosecutions calls for a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district where the crime is committed. Defendants must be fully informed of all aspects of the trial and crime. Witnesses for and against the defendant will be heard and the defendant shall have the assistance of a counsel. These rights are important for the process of trials and the protections for people accused of crimes.
The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution is important for a number of reasons. One of the rights with the sixth Amendment related to criminal prosecutions calls for a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district where the crime is committed. Defendants must be fully informed of all aspects of the trial and crime. Witnesses for and against the defendant will be heard and the defendant shall have the assistance of a counsel. These rights are important for the process of trials and the protections for people accused of crimes.
Ive heard of that before