That is highly unlikely. Illiterate is defined as being unable to read or write, or demonstrating a very limited education and level of literacy. Were we all illiterate, we would be unable to read this question or answer it.
Yes. After all, who liked George W. Bush but illiterate fools and rednecks?
illegible illegitimate illiterate illogical These all mean not. (Not logical = illogical)
Not all of them. The poor commoners were illiterate. The rich ones and the middling income ones, instead, could afford an education.
You are illiterate because you cannot create a sentence using the word illiterate.
illiterate in spanish is analfabeto
Illiterate.
il-literate (illiterate)
Illiterate
Considering literacy is a requirement for all subjects, I would say not at all
Illiterate refers to someone who cannot read or write, while uneducated refers to someone who lacks knowledge or formal education in general. A person can be literate but still uneducated, while someone who is illiterate is also considered uneducated.
Illiterate is usually an adjective, and in this sense does not have a plural form. The noun for illiterate is illiteracy, for which the plural can be illiteracies, but it is awkward. Illiterate is sometimes used as a noun to describe an illiterate person, in which case the plural would be illiterates, e.g. as in the insult, "You are a bunch of illiterates!"
male are more illiterate. for sure ;)