Answer: Vile. The Assyrians raped, pillaged, burned, and massacred all non-Assyrians who resisted their advance and even some who did not.
They were certainly not passive, as the Assyrians were a militaristic empire.
They could be considered artistic in that they made artworks, especially statues, but they were not known for their art or culture like the Greeks were.
They were certainly not just since they were incredibly ethnicist and repressive.
b. deemphasize the subject.
C. establish a casual tone
The cause of the assyrian warrior way of life is because their land was believed to be small and easy to conquered so they had to fight without choice ... This is the reason that most of their time, their way of life had to do with fighting
That is the artistic choice that Steven Spielberg made in order to tell the story.
With a book of shrimp anatomy and your choice of artistic medium. I would suggest modeling clay.
The subject as such is not crucial to the artistic value. There may be very badly made pictures of Christ. Picasso made a lovely sculpture of a baboon.
The subject as such is not crucial to the artistic value. There may be very badly made pictures of Christ. Picasso made a lovely sculpture of a baboon.
It doesn't have a meaning. It's an architectural or artistic choice. It provides light saturation and symmetry.
where did you hear that? it isnt
Baroque art emerged in the late sixteenth century. How did this artistic style differ from that of Reformation art?
Yes, the choice of subject by an artist can impact the artistic value of the art. Different subjects can evoke different emotions, convey different messages, and resonate differently with viewers, all of which can influence the perceived value of the artwork. Additionally, the skill and creativity with which the subject is portrayed can also affect the overall artistic value.
Honestly, it doesn't make a difference. Its the persons choice if they want to be the active or passive partner, or both.