According to the author backing up is always considered dangerous?
The vehicle that was performing the backing maneuver is generally always the one at fault.
Always look over your shoulder.
The driver of the backing vehicle. The fact that the car was parked illegally is irrelevant. The onus is always on the driver of a moving vehicle to ensure the way is clear before backing up.
In any situation in which a vehicle backing out of a property hits another vehicle, the driver who was backing up is always at fault, barring speeding, impairment, or disregarded traffic controls/signs on the part of the driver who was on the road. Added: I concur. The vehicle operating in reverse must always yield to any other vehicle. The charge I am familiar with is "Backing Without Caution."
The car in motion is ALWAYS at fault when it hits a stationary vehicle.
Extrapolation is dangerous because trends change and outcomes can not always be predicted.
The operator of the backing vehicle is always at fault hen a stationary object is struck.
You should always be looking behind you when backing up. You don't look forward when reversing because you're not moving in a forward direction.
The backing vehicle is at fault. We are always supposed to look to ensure the path is clear before placing our vehicle in motion.
Yes , Ofcourse because robbers are always back of you..
Yes. Being illegally parked does not affect fault. If you strike a parked vehicle, it is ALWAYS your fault because you have a duty to ensure the way was clear before moving.
look behind you.