Want this question answered?
Because British had about 32,000 soldiers but America was vastly outnumbered, untrained recruits with poor equipment.
because they had a very good plan to defeat the American troops.
hot ,quite poor ,with under armed british soldiers
hot ,quite poor ,with under armed british soldiers
That's just what powerful governments do to poor citizens. -Just like the USA made thousands of poor or ill educated Americans go to Vietnam while the rich and well educated remained in US.
soldiers did nothing they wre poor soldiers did nothing they wre poor
soldiers
American colonists seeking independence ... American loyalists seeking to remain part of the British empire ... Irish soldiers fighting in the British Army ... poor seamen pressed into service in the British Navy ... German mercenaries hired by the British ... French volunteers for the American side ... etc., etc.
they used daggers and poor quality armour
Most union soldiers were wealthy and well organized.
Poor conditions for captured soldiers
Markius is not a historical figure or term associated with any known changes to the Roman army. It is possible that you may have misspelled or misremembered the name or event you are referring to. Can you please provide more information or clarify your question?