Approval by Congress pretty well legitimizes anything. Congress makes the laws.
The Supreme Court may eventually revoke laws passed by Congress and signed by the president, but that takes time and the law is legitimate until it is revoked.
legal rational authority
No, he needs the approval of Congress and no President has sought that authority since FDR.
As the Commander in Chief the US President has authority over the entire military, so all of them. He has the authority to deploy up to 400,000 at a time without needing the approval of Congress
The President should and must have power to make certain decision without Congressional approval, just as Congress has the right to do things without the President's approval. If Congress had to approve everything a President did, Congress would have full authority over both the legislative and executive power of governmant, which would eliminate the concept of checks and balances of the three branches of government that the Constitution sets up.
from the president to congress back to the president.
The President . . .Added: . . . with the approval of Congress
For the United States military, the final authority to direct the use of nuclear weapons is the President of the United States. This also requires the approval of an administrative official who has been approved by Congress.
This deals with the system of Checks & Balances. The President can "check the authority of Congress" by rejecting a unconstitutional law proposed by Congress. this process is called veto.The President checks Congress when he vetoes a bill that the Congress has passed. Congress can check him if a 2/3 majority votes to override his veto.Also, the President can check Congress by using the media (the "bully pulpit") to set the agenda for Congress. Presidents also tend to have success with Congress proportional to their approval rating with the public. Thus, if a president has a high approval rating, it is likely that Congress will be willing to help him accomplish his goals.
The President . . .Added: . . . with the approval of Congress
The powers of the president are he can veto bills, approve bills, make treaties with the approval of congress, start a police action but not declare war. It is the job of congress to declare war. Submit names of advisors and cabinet members for approval and replace a Supreme Court judge with congress approval. Submit a budget and get congress approval for the budget.
The powers of the president are he can veto bills, approve bills, make treaties with the approval of congress, start a police action but not declare war. It is the job of congress to declare war. Submit names of advisors and cabinet members for approval and replace a Supreme Court judge with congress approval. Submit a budget and get congress approval for the budget.
The powers of the president are he can veto bills, approve bills, make treaties with the approval of congress, start a police action but not declare war. It is the job of congress to declare war. Submit names of advisors and cabinet members for approval and replace a Supreme Court judge with congress approval. Submit a budget and get congress approval for the budget.
Yes, which is the whole point of it. The President does not have the authority to declare war; only Congress can do that. The President does have the authority to begin emergency operations overseas, but must obtain approval of Congress for any operations lasting longer than 90 days.This, like other limitations on executive authority, only have any effect when the President obeys them or Congress enforces them. For example, the recent debacles in Libya and Syria were not approved by Congress, but the President did them anyway. Congress would have been within their rights to impeach the President, but did not do so, rendering this law essentially moot.