Adam is wrong its not true
They both can cause damage
They're both natural disasters and both cause tons of damage. Beyond that they are completely different.
Not necessarily. The level of damage caused by an earthquake depends on factors such as population density, building construction, and distance from the epicenter. Even earthquakes of similar magnitudes can have different impacts due to these variables.
No, the earthquake in the ocean cause the water to make the tsunami
People avoid or limit an earthquake's damage by building structures that will not fail in the earthquake or subsequent events and make it safe at the same time.
The other way round. Landslides may be triggered by earthquakes but do not cause them.A large enough landslide will cause seismic activity that can be detected by seismometers however the trigger isn't the same as that found in earthquakes.
Aug 5 1910 and Sept 21 1993... both were about the same in shock size. The 1910 earthquake was the largest historical shock within the state's boundaries, but it occurred too far offshore to cause damage, whereas the damaging 1993 earthquake was the largest historical earthquake beneath the land area of Oregon
It depends on the magnitude of an earthquake. For example, a 2.0 magnitude earthquake would virtually kill no one and cause little to no damage. However, a 9.0 earthquake could kill thousands and destroy whole cities.
i do believe its earthquake, cause I've got Pokemon platinum and tm26 is earthquake but i don't know if its the same, but im sure it is.
collapse
dont come on ask google it
they are the same because they all cause damage to the earth