No...you could see cells with a microscope.
Because cells were difficult to see without a microscope.
a microscope
Robert Hooke looked at a cork under a microscope, not plant cells!
Individual cells are too small to see with the naked eye, so a microscope is used.
You need a microscope to see red blood cells.
The microscope that is more useful to estimate red blood cells is an electron microscope because it can magnify to see cells that other microscopes can't see such as the light microscope
Blood cells are tiny you can only see them using a microscope. They are not HUGE! As an elephant they are trying to trick you.
No...you could see cells with a microscope.
Blood cells. The largest compartment of blood cells are the red blood cells (also called erythrocytes), but you would also see white blood cells (including lymphocytes and phagocytes) and some platelets.
it is a realy big microscope that can look at thing close up I.E if you put some human blood under it you can see all the cells
We need a microscope to see cells because they are too small to see without one.
Because cells are so tiny you need a microscope to see them, and the microscope was invented in 1590, therefore you could not see cells before then
Because cells are way to small to see without a microscope.
Sure! it's like so awesome to see your blood cells especially the red ones!
Robert Hooke did not discover blood cells. He was the first person to see cells. He saw cells of the oak plant in cork. He viewed a tiny slice of cork under his microscope and saw small compartments which he called cells.
Yes, optical microscopes can see cells.