0
It *MIGHT*. However, all present observational evidence is that our Universe will not fall back into itself, meaning our Universe will not experience a Big Crunch.
As observations and theory develop in the future, we MIGHT conclude differently. Or we might not. Predicting scientific discoveries is not (dare I say it?) an exact science.
What else can I help you with?
What are the Reverse effects of the big bang theory?
The Big Crunch hypothesis.
Which theory suggests that for every big bang there is a crunch?
The theory that suggests for every big bang there is a crunch is known as the "Big Crunch" theory. It proposes that the expansion of the universe will eventually stop and reverse, leading to a contraction of the universe back to a singular point, followed by another big bang.
When will big bang two will happen?
yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.
What is the difference between big bang theory and big crunch theory?
The big bang theory is the explosion that started the universe. Where as the big crunch is the theory where the universe will eventually contract and become increasingly clumped and eventaully all mater would collapse into black holes which would then coalesce producing a unified black hole or Big Crunch singularity.
When is the next Big Bang?
There may be at some point near the end of the universe, if the whole universe does the opposite of the Big Bang. Should the universe implode into one big mass in what we call the Big Crunch, another Big Bang could follow. Humans may not experience this because as it stands now, when our Sun dies, Earth dies. Additionally, nothing we know of could survive the Big Crunch.
Was the big bang a cause or a consequence?
The Big Bang is the cause of everything we know - the Universe around us. If the Big Bang itself was caused by something else, we don't know about it.
How does the big bounce theory differ from the big bang theory?
in big bang theory the particles will just move away outside. while in big bounce, a stage will come when all the particles once again will form singularity as the result of big crunch. that's what i think.
Is there a thing called the big crunch theory?
yes it states that the universe will stop expanding and start crunching back up to a state before the big bang
What if the universe began as a giant star Or maybe the big bang was the result of a supernova on an enormous scale The center of our universe is believe to be a black hole cause by super novas?
These are interesting conjectures, but there is no way to determine if any of them have any validity. My own favorite unprovable hypothesis is the Big Bang/Big Crunch of a cyclical universe; everything in the universe eventually falls together in a Big Crunch, reaching infinite density, and a rebound effect causes the collapsed universe to explode into a new Big Bang - to be followed some uncounted billions of years later by another Big Crunch. There's no way to prove - or to disprove - this idea, either. The truth is, for now, we do not have enough information to determine what the origin of the universe is, or what the ultimate fate of the universe will be. We may NEVER know these things.
Did the Big Bang cause the earth's crust?
The planet Earth and its crust did not form until about nine billion years after the Big Bang. In a sense, the Big Bang caused everything, but the connection of the Big Bang to the Earth's crust is not very direct.
Were all things gathering before the big bang?
There is no data on what might have occurred before the Big Bang. There is not even a consensus on whether the phrase "before the Big Bang" is valid to begin with.That having been said, cosmologists now strongly favour non-cyclical models of the universe; the hypothesis that the Big Bang might be a continuation of the cosmos following a preceding Big Crunch is very much out of favour.
What existed to cause big bang?
This is not known at this time.
