i guess...if it kinda had something to do with the case...
No, a defendant in a civil case does not have to testify. It is their choice whether or not to take the stand and provide testimony.
Grand jury testimony is generally protected by secrecy, meaning that it cannot be used directly in civil court. However, if a witness voluntarily discloses their grand jury testimony outside of the grand jury proceedings, that information may be admissible in civil court. Additionally, if the testimony relates to issues in a civil case, it could potentially influence the proceedings indirectly. Ultimately, the specifics can vary based on jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case.
The witness might be punished for perjury, altho I doubt it.
I want him to take care of his child on his own not be forced.
Yes, you can sue someone for perjury in civil court if they have provided false testimony or evidence. Perjury is the act of lying under oath, and it is considered a serious offense in both criminal and civil cases. If someone has committed perjury in a civil case, you may be able to file a lawsuit against them for damages resulting from their false testimony.
In a civil case, a defendant cannot be forced to testify. The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves in any legal proceeding, including civil cases.
In some cases 18. Children's testimony is often not allowed as hearsay. If a child needs to give testimony it is usually via a therapist or guardian ad litem.
Yes, you can be compelled to testify in a civil case through a subpoena issued by the court. Failure to comply with a subpoena can result in legal consequences.
In the US the prosecution may call anyone who can give testimony or expert evidence. This would include a social worker who may have been involved in a civil case.
Same as they do in a criminal case - listen to the testimony, the evidence, and the arguments and come to a verdict that they believe is correct.
Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.
No the fact is that in the case of a dispute in the longrun it is up to the child to chose the name. in the mean time if you are charged with the child's rearing you can introduce it as you like.