answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

yes because, there is a lack of real evidence, like body sample, evidence from the footage, eyewitnesses, etc, hence a conviction is made

User Avatar

clayton andrew

Lvl 4
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Alberta Schmitt

Lvl 1
2y ago
i'm not sure this is correct
More answers
User Avatar

clayton andrew

Lvl 4
2y ago

those are based on assumptions, based arguments not facts

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

It depends on if the jury believes beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

circumstantial evidence usually leads to the finding of a concrete evidence thus leading to the conviction of a criminal.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Yes, but there has to be allot of it and it has to be compelling to convict someone purely on circumstantial evidence. But it can and has been done.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can a defendant be convicted solely on the basis of circumstantial evidence?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can someone be convicted based solely upon a confession?

yes A person can be arrested based on a confession; getting a conviction is another story. Although it happens often especially if a defendant pleads guilty, juries may want more information to convict than solely on the confession. That's why you need a lawyer.


What is the only type of trial that is not by jury?

A defendant can request to be tried by the judge alone. He cannot be forced to do this by any governmental power. It is solely the choice of the defendant.


Can a person be convicted of a crime without proper evidence the accusor states that she thinks he had a gun in the discovery?

People have been convicted without proper evidence. The accusation should be investigated; perhaps you did have a gun and fear a conviction based solely on her testimony. I don't know how to prove a negative (that you did not have a gun), but if you did there are other ways to show it besides her say so; other people saw it, there is other evidence of a gun in your possession like bullets or a gun box. This is why you need a lawyer.


What is the role and function of the jury?

in a criminal case to determine if the prosecution proved the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt or not....in a civil case to determine if the defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a result of his (the defendant's) action or failure to act and if so to what extent


Can a convicted felon own ahandgun in fl?

Based solely on the information provided in the question, NO, they may not legally own or possess a firearm.


Why has Dr Aafia been convicted by a jury in the US?

Nobel peace prize 2009 was awarded to Obama solely to dissociate the USA from everything that could be linked to conscience and morality on any count. Hence, Dr Aafia stands convicted.


How do you use allude in a sentence when referring to detective?

"What you allude to is based solely upon supposition, you errant detective, you!", exclaimed the defendant. If the detective wishes to allude to gossip, please disallow his/her testimony.


Would it be good or bad for a jurier to draw an inference?

Not sure what you are asking. Draw an inference from WHAT? Draw an inference from WHO? Jurors are supposed to try a defendant based solely on the FACTS produced in evidence and testimony and as instructed by the judge. Given that... jurors are all human. If there is any doubt about anything, the time to hash it all out is in the jury room during deliberation with your fellow jurors.


Can you be convicted on home invasion 2ND degree solely on someones statement that stated that you knew where to do a crime not that you actually did it?

If you assisted or encouraged the crime, yes. You don't necessarily have to be present to be a part of the criminal activity.


What is the antonym of basic research?

Let's see, there is "hearsay," or the acceptance of evidence based solely on the opinion of others. and there also is search.


What is malicious prosecution in tort?

malicious prosecution,i would say, is an action for damages against the plaintiff by the defendant on various grounds....but solely out of malice,ill-will,spite....when i mentioned various grounds i meant that they were just excuses that the defendant used to prosecute the plaintiff whereas in fact his main reason was malice. here,the plaintiff and defendant can be old enemies or even competetors in the industrial realm or otherwise.Also, this case of malicious prosecution will not be justified by facts....rather it will be a a case brought about just to injure he plaintiff.


Which country's national flag is solely green?

Greenpeace! :-)and the Solely-Green website is:http://Solely-Green.com------------------------------------------------------Solely-Green.com