No, the two species are not related closely enough.
When you do this, you will get a 1/2 Canadian and 1/2 standard bred foal.
I know u can have an arappaloosa an Arabian cross appaloosa.
The lion and tiger to make the liger. The donkey and horse to make the mule.
The Gelderland is a pure bred horse and was not created by crossing any other breeds. The Gelderland was cross bred with the Groningen were crossed to make the Royal Dutch Harness horse.
you can not cross a horse and a human together because they have different chromesomes. you could possibly cut a dead human in half and a dead horse and sew them together like einstein and bring them to life with electricity
a Morgan is a breed of horse and a welsh is a breed of pony... Morgan x welsh horse simply means that it is a cross bred horse and the two breeds that it has in it are Morgan and welsh
Mules have been bred since at least 3,000 B.C. in ancient Egypt, where they were used much as they have been in the 5,000 years since: as beasts of burden.
You get a crossbreed foal. For instance, if you bred an American Walking Horse and a Mustang and you got a colt, it would be an American Walking Horse X Mustang colt. This is said as, "American Walking Horse Mustang cross". At least I think so.
No but there are champion bred horses
Then the horse would be a part-bred, though it would most likely not be quite a Welsh part-bred breed, (there is a breed called Welsh part-bred). The horse would obviously still be very skilled in dressage, as both the Morgan and Welsh excel in that area. It would also most likely do good in jumping and trotting.
Draft horse
You would get a cross bred horse with the possibility of it maybe qualifying to be registered as an American Azteca, though it would likely only get partial registry for not being a purebred.