no
yes
A duel is a fight between two people
Using large, nuclear weapons, eg. Bombs
In a fair fight both parties have the same chances to win (eg: 2 people using the same tools or weapons).
They began with using weapons such as rocks and spears, but soon they used guns.
Making weapons is as dangerous as using them because the production process often involves hazardous materials and conditions that can harm workers and the environment. Additionally, the arms industry can perpetuate cycles of violence and conflict, contributing to broader societal instability. The human cost includes not only the lives lost in conflicts fueled by these weapons but also the impact on communities affected by violence, displacement, and trauma. Overall, both manufacturing and using weapons contribute to a cycle of suffering that extends far beyond the battlefield.
Had to learn to fight a war with one's hands tied; had to fight without using all of one's weapons (no nukes).
Yes, it not only damages the environment but it also kills wildlife and can affect human life and can destroy it.
Beowulf says he will fight Grendel without weapons or armor, using only his bare hands to show his strength and bravery. He believes in using his own physical strength and skill to defeat the monstrous enemy.
It depends. If the human had a gun and they saw the tiger before it attacked them, the human would win. Of course, if the human didn't see the tiger in time or was un-armed, there would be no chance for the human.
New weapons had been developed and the armies were still using some old ways to fight.
As long as weapons weren't used and it's a fair fight (fists) no kicking, biting, using weapons of any sort, then charges generally are not brought against the older person. If the older person is a bully then yes, the minor can tell their parents and press charges.