No, that is why it is called a MANDATORY minimum sentence. The judge has no discretion.
Not likely. It is, after all, the very minimum. But they may get early release with good behavior.
NO the can not
No. A "mandatory" minimum is exactly what its name implies. The judge has no discretion and MUST impose the minimum set by the statute.
If a statute imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of incarceration, then yes, it is "binding" meaning a judge cannot impose a sentence less than that minimum.
No, that is why it is called a MANDATORY minimum sentence.
A judge exercises wide discretionary powers in sentencing cases that come before him, except (in the US) where the legislatures have written mandatory sentences into the statute law. The judge may NOT change these mandatory minimums.
The answer lies within the question. "Minimum MANDATORY" - means the judge has no option to sentence less. The sentence was set by the state legislature.
Certain laws that define criminal actions also prescribe a specific mandatory jail term. This means that the judge cannot give probation or a fine etc instead, but must sentence a person found guilty of that crime to jail time. In most cases it specifies a minimum number of months or days for the crime.
The principle reason for the judge's diminished sentencing power is that the judge would impose a prison sentence with both a minimum and a maximum term in years such as a 2 years minimum to 5 years maximum, or 5 years minimum to 20 years maximum.Another View: A reason for a judge's diminished sentencing power would be the proliferation of legislatively mandated minimum sentences attached to the statute law that the state legislatures are passing. The law, as passed by the legislature TELLS the judge how much fine or sentence he/she MUST impose and allows no leeway for judicial discretion.
There are many ways a judge can impose a sentence. One example is "I sentence you to ten years in prison."
It is known as a pre-sentencing investigation.
It COULD be the judge in the case, but nowadays, in many states, the state legislatures have passed what is known as Mandatory Minimum terms for certain crimes. This means that the judges do not have discretion to sentence the defendant, but MUST sentence the defendant to the time specified by the legislature.
No. He does not have that discretion. If the legislature sets a certain MANDATORY sentence for a particular offense, the judge MUST uphold the law, not over-rule it.
If you appear before the judge with a smug, nonchalant attitude, he's more likely to impose the maximum sentence.