No, a scientific law cannot be demonstrated mathematically as mathematical proofs area form of rationalism (logical based) whereas scientific proofs are a form of empiricism (evidence based), so neither a mathematical law can be proved scientifically nor a scientif law be proved mathematically.
No, it's the other way around. Newton's third (also first) law can be mathematically derived from his second law.
The first law of motion follows from the second, for the case that the net force is zero.
Friction has no effect whatsoever on the law. But if friction is present, then the law can't be demonstrated, because the moving object always has an external force acting on it.
Suffragettes demonstrated to try to get votes for women. Sometimes they broke the law in their demonstrations. They were hoping to get new laws made that allowed votes for women. So they were both law breakers and law makers.
The Malus' law states that the intensity of the polarized light transmitted through the analyser varies as the square of the cosine of the angle between the plane of transmission of the analyser and the plane of the polarizer. Mathematically, it would be: I ∞ cos2θ or I = I0 x cos2θ.
A law is a descriptive principle that describes a phenomenon observed in nature, often derived from repeated observations or experiments. A theorem is a statement that can be proven rigorously using logic and established principles in a particular field, like mathematics or science. In essence, laws describe while theorems prove.
Mostly semantics. A "law" is a theory that can be expressed mathematically.
turd
George Washington
Ohm's Law
A scientific law can be demonstrated and experimewntally validated.
No, it's the other way around. Newton's third (also first) law can be mathematically derived from his second law.
No, it's the other way around. Newton's third (also first) law can be mathematically derived from his second law.
Law of conservation
Mostly semantics. A "law" is a theory that can be expressed mathematically.
The first law of motion follows from the second, for the case that the net force is zero.
The Law of Motion is once again demonstrated.