There is no rational route for this. For example we have Ohm's Law, but we only have Pythagoras' Theorem. Even though it may be proven and invariant.
And in economics we have the "Laws of Supply and Demand" even though hedged with all sorts of precautions, and economics is not really a science.
Continuing research can turn up new or conflicting information regarding a theory or scientific law. It will then be changed even after general acceptance.
There is no rational route for this. For example we have Ohm's Law, but we only have Pythagoras' Theorem. Even though it may be proven and invariant.And in economics we have the "Laws of Supply and Demand" even though hedged with all sorts of precautions, and economics is not really a science.
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world based on a body of evidence and observations. Laws, on the other hand, are descriptions of natural phenomena that have been observed to occur consistently. A theory explains why something happens, while a law simply describes what happens. Thus, a theory cannot become a law because they serve different purposes within the scientific framework.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
It was a law not the theory because this principle has also proved by him.
A "law" contains absolute certainty or scientific truth. A theory is very close to being a law, but without the absoluteness. That is what a theory is. If you have a pretty good idea of how something in science might work you might form a hypothesis (hye-POTH-uh-suss). With enough additional proofs and evidence, a hypothesis may someday turn into a theory.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Ozone depletion is a theory. It is not a law because it is not passed to government.