it really depends, if they know its bad but still do it then i guess yes, but most of the time they are unaware of what there doing or unaware that what they are doing is wrong.
It depends on the mental illness and the patient adhering to the treatment program.
Each person should be held responsible and accountable for their actions to the extent and parameters of a) comprehension b) intention and c) ability to repeat the action.
The term for the process whereby a person is held responsible for the actions of a business is "liability." This can include legal, financial, or ethical responsibilities for the business's actions.
Individualism.
Some attributes of a mentally ill person include irrational actions, an inability to communicate, and a lack of social skills. Most people with mental illness can be treated with a variety of medication to reduce or eliminate their symptoms.
At the age of 18 a person is legally considered an adult and legally responsible for their actions, whether the actions be: illegal; signing a contract; getting married.
Tell the truth. that will show that person you are responsible for your actions.
A mentally healthy person is safe
The person, acting as a fiduciary or trustee of the SS payments, is responsible for those assets being properly used. He may be responsible to assure the needs of the person are taken care of as best available...but NOT financially responsible to do so. The mentally disabled person is unable to legally contract, except perhaps for his/her own basic care needs (which should be taken care of by the payee), hence they should not have any personal debts.
If a person is escorted in the workplace, that person's safety is the responsibility of the person providing the escort. That includes ensuring the the escorted person does not take any actions that would put himself or others at increased risk.
Yes, a person who is not mentally challenged can divorce a person who is mentally challenged would have to be proven they are mentally challenged), but they would have to let the courts decide in the provisions of the divorce what you would pay to help sustain the lifestyle of the mentally challenged person.
because that person is chosing to get drunk or high....its not like someone is forcing them
mentally disabled