0
Yes. There is a big difference between working and working well. A good program will not only serve a function but also run quickly, have easily readable source code, and not have any side effects.
for a in stuff:
if a 1 for letter in word):
print 'it has a one in it'
else:
print 'it does not have a one in it.'\
the two sections of code both do the same thing, but the second is more readable and shorter.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What computers can't and can do in terms of productivity reasoning and error?
Computers cannot correct any wrong inputs by its own,it still needs human to correct it.
What other test could you perform to prove that it was your computers firewall that was blocking the connection and not the firewall on the computer you are using as a client?
The test that can prove which computer's firewall is blocking a program from running is to turn off the firewall on the computer being used, then try to run the program in question. If the program still doesn't work, then the main computer is blocking the program.
Is it possible to be agile and still maintain a quality focus?
Yes. You need to have good documentation and a thorough understanding of the relationship between modules.
Are computers fast enough to be intelligent?
a computer as know still dumb so far no matter which one you look at, does not matter how fast they are they still a dumb piece of equipment until someone program the PC to do something.
How do you program a minka aire remote?
with light switch off, hold the "off" button on the fan part of the control & then turn light switch on while still holding the button.
Can a program be correct and still not exhibit good quality?
Good quality is broad concept. The correctness of program could not be the only one factor to judge good quality of program.
But still is it correct English?
it is not correct English, you rather say still
Whatever happened to designer Zoran Ladicorbic?
He still lives in New York City, but no loner produces his collection. There is a FaceBook fan page dedicated to him, and in 2012, his work was featured in the exibit at the musaum at F.I.T. called "From A To Z".
Which is correct - you are interested in working on the presidential campaign if the opportunity still exist OR if the opportunity still exists?
The second one is correct: "If the opportunity still exists."
Is there any future for program developers?
yes there is still a future for program developers
Can you still get the ambassadors program after august 2011?
no
Is Paul Wappat's program still on?
wappsat.praqramlari
Can iPads play 1280x720 video?
Assuming the video is in the correct format, the answer is Yes; however the video will be downscaled to fit within the 1024x768 screen dimensions (rendering at roughly 1024x576). Assuming the quality of the original is very good, the quality will still be very good, though no longer displayed at the original resolution.
What is grammatically correct still in process or still in processing?
"Still in process" is more grammatically correct. "Processing" is a verb form, whereas "process" is a noun form that functions better in this context.
Is it still correct to address an envelope to a little boy with Master?
I think that Master is correct
What is a good sentence including the word anthropomorphism?
"Some people show a great interest in drwaing and wirting about animals that exibit anthropomorphism.""Many Egyptian gods had traits of animals, but still had anthropomorphism.""Humans are one of a few animals that have natural anthropomorphism."Does those help?
How is Fitness for 10 different from other expensive gyms in terms of equipment quality and trainers?
Fitness for 10 is a smaller group program I believe. It is different because you can work with people but still have focus on yourself. This is very helpful when training .
