Of course not! A public defender is paid by the public and represents the defendant.
They most certainly cannot do so. It would be a conflict of interest.
defendant or accused
Are you the victim or the defendant?
Yes. Crimes are prosecuted by the state, not the victims. Whether or not the victim wants the crime prosecuted is irrelevant. If the crime has been committed, there is enough evidence to prosecute, and it is in the public's interest to curb this type of crime, the crime should be prosecuted. Additionally, in the area of domestic violence battery particularly, there is an emotional involvement between the victim and the defendant. In this area, perhaps more than any other area, the defendant "gets to" the victim and discourages cooperation at an alarming rate. Often, when the victim refuses to cooperate with authorities, and the case is not prosecuted, the victim is attacked again later by the same defendant.
Restitution is paid generally through the Defendant's probation officer if he has one or the Clerk's Office of the sentencing court. If the Defendant does pay the victim directly he should get a receipt or note stating how much was paid and how much is the balance due.
Restitution.
It'd be best to go, because you're the proof aren't you? NO,MY BOYFRIEND IS THE DEFENDANT!
In a criminal law case there are 6 parties involved. These parties include the victim, the defendant or suspect, the defense attorney, the prosecutor, the judge, and the jury.
The victim employs lawyers. but they are organizations who also protect and represent the victim.
Absolutely! This all depends upon whether or not the government as a strong case against the defendant, with or without the victim.
It's not really possibly to easily answer this question, given that there are so many different jurisdictions and each has it's own laws and system. The civil system tends to primarily offer victims monetary rewards, or things like restraining orders. The criminal system can obviously punish a defendant with prison, although the criminal system is not technically a victim v. defendant mechanism. It's a "state" or "people" v. the defendant, with the victim having some rights. Ultimately, which offered more "satisfaction" to the victim is something only the victim could answer.
This is the job of your attorney or public defender. Being a victim of circumstance does not directly effect the out come of your trial - if you commit a crime you most likely will have to answer for it. Only the most extenuating circumstances (for example - someone holding a gun to your head or to your loved ones) is going to have much effect on your culpability.