Currently, the definition of living excludes robots definitely.
However, personally I feel that Humans are pretty similar to robots, in the fact that Humans are 'programmed' in a way, as anything you do is pretty much justifiable, just maybe the 'coding' and 'programming' is more complex. But I feel that robots may be more and more similar to living things, maybe even considered to be living one day, like how some robots can 'learn' nowadays.
By definition, a robot is a machine and therefore not a living entity.
nonliving
Julie Newmar played a robot on the TV show "My Living Doll".
Non-living as it has no metabolism
Robot
A robot?
No, a probe is a robot, so it's not really living.
Living in 8 Bits - 2010 ROB the Robot 1-1 was released on: USA: 24 April 2010
Non-Living, it is an artificial mechanical device made to mimic a human being.
Living in 8 Bits - 2010 Robot Master Auditions 4-3 was released on: USA: April 2013
A robot is not a living organism because it does not possess biological functions like growth, adaptation, reproduction, and metabolism that are essential characteristics of living organisms. Robots are created by humans and operate based on programmed instructions and technology, lacking the ability to independently exhibit traits of living organisms.
Does not reproduce, non organic. also does not need water to live