Generally, no. Social security funds are usually exempt from garnishment to satisfy judgment. There are so exceptions, though.
Yes
Generally they can't garnish your account for a debt in your husbands name only unless he also uses your account - as in a joint account or his pay is deposited in the account.
Yes. They have everyone's account on a separate screen all the time, with at least 1 person watching each screen. I would know because I used to be in Social Security. They can probably see me typing this now. Hello Social Security!
her real account is real_torii_vega shes the real victoria because her accs got lots of security and is protected by the stardoll staff.
That's at the discretion of the party who won the lawsuit and had the judgment enforced. In general creditors are only open to a settlement/payment agreement before a lawsuit is undertaken.
because that was god's judgment on us because that was god's judgment on us
So they know you are not drunk and forget that you have made the choice of making the Facebok account...This is because drunk people will not be able to type in the letters that they have wrote
"Judgment-proof" means that even if a plaintiff obtains its civil judgment against its defendant, the defendant has no assets from on which the court can levy in proceedings in aid of execution to satisfy the judgment. It also generally implies that as a result the defendant is not worth being sued, because the possibility of ultimately recovering a money judgment is nil.Added: There is no such legal principle as judgment proof. It is not a defense to a lawsuit. One can obtain a judgment against a defendant, regardless of the ability to collect the judgment. Plaintiffs often choose to proceed against defendants who appear to be judgment proof because they believe that the defendant will eventually have assets or income against which to collect.You are correct. The status of being judgment-proof is as a matter of fact and not a matter of law. Which is why I used the word "implied" and not the word "holds". Therefore, it is legal to the extent that as a matter of fact the judgment cannot be satisfied.
The collection agency can freeze your account, and garnish enough to satisfy the FULL amount of judgment, including court costs, attorneys fees AND interest accrued, which averages about 10%. So because the judgment verdict also has attached to it various fees, and accrues interest, the collection agency has the right to garnish the FULL CURRENT VALUE of the judgment. Your court of origin should be able to provide a full accounting of the current value of your judgment.
Gmail account cannot connect to a third party site. It is because the site can be virus or malware. To avoid the security loss, it does not connect.
Pay the amount of the lien to the lien holder, then give him/her the prescribed amount of time to remove the lien. You can do that in writing and make sure it's sent by certified mail and/or paid by an independent third party acting on your request. Your state will have a requirement that the lien be removed within a given period of time following payment. If the lien is NOT removed after you pay the bill, you may have legal recourse.
Recovery of Judgment is really good.. I am working with them right now and so far their services have been great its been 2 months and they've already found a bank account which they can freeze! Even though my judgment was for $3,200 this company was able to get more because of the 9% interest that is added on each year for this judgment.. Google them and check them out!