Of course. It's addressed to you.
Yes they do
The basic assumption is that yes, the spouse is jointly responsible. It is assumed that both spouses will benefit from the transactions.
Including both spouses' names on utility bills is not necessary, but it can be beneficial for joint accountability and shared responsibility.
With cash of course......Yes... Spousal Consent would be needed if the property was to be purchased by taking out a loan in both spouses names...But there are no laws requiring spousal consent for another spouse to make cash purchases of property...
Your options are for one spouse to adopt the other spouse's current or former name, to create a hybrid version of a current or former name of each spouse (using hyphenation or even creating a new word using syllables from both names), or both spouses adopting a completely new last name.
It depends. If the deceased had a spouse (or if he was in a polygamous marriage) but if he had no descendants, the spouse (or spouses) will inherit the estate. If there are only descendants but no spouses, then it will be they who inherit the estate. In case there are both spouse(s) and descendants, the spouse will receive R125 000 and the balance will go to the children. Also, if there are neither descendants nor spouses, the parents (or one parent and the other descendants of that parent) will split the estate equally.
In Arizona, both spouses are generally liable for debts guaranteed by one spouse, unless the debt was incurred for the benefit of only one spouse or the family.
No. Either owner has right to use and possession of the car therefore that would not be considered stealing. You might sue the person in small claim court for your interest in the car.
If one spouse owes taxes but the other spouse doesn't, they may still be held jointly responsible for the debt. This is because the IRS can pursue both spouses for the full amount owed, regardless of who earned the income. It's important for both spouses to communicate and work together to address the tax debt to avoid any potential penalties or consequences.
The estate has primary responsibility. But the debts of a spouse are a benefit to both of them, so both have the responsibility.
No.... If the none attending spouse doesn't contest to the divorce. Also if one of the spouses does not show the spouse that shows is granted what they request in the divorce proceedings
In Arizona, a non-borrowing spouse can be affected by mortgage loans even if they are not on the title. Under Arizona's community property laws, both spouses have rights to property acquired during the marriage, which includes debts incurred. If a property is purchased with a mortgage, both spouses may be liable for the debt, even if only one spouse is on the title or the loan. It's advisable for non-borrowing spouses to understand their rights and seek legal guidance to protect their interests.