Yes. One could create a file called standalone.adb with the contents: with Text_IO; procedure Standalone is begin Text_IO.Put_Line("I am so alone"); end Standalone; and have another package in a file called package_1.ads with the contents: package package_1 is procedure Standalone; end package_1; (Not providing the body of this package in the example but obviously one is needed). At this point, we have shown that it is possible but the next question is (maybe) how would you call them. with Standalone; with Package_1; procedure My_Main_Program is begin Standalone; Package_1.Standalone; end My_Main_Program;
with the package name syntax: <package name> with the interface name.
"Hollie" is a name that is not typically a shortened form of another name. It is generally used as a standalone name.
Leon is typically a standalone name and is not commonly abbreviated or short for any longer name.
It will have the default access which means - this class will be accessible only within the current package.
You don't execute a package; you execute a class. A package is just a grouping of classes.You don't execute a package; you execute a class. A package is just a grouping of classes.You don't execute a package; you execute a class. A package is just a grouping of classes.You don't execute a package; you execute a class. A package is just a grouping of classes.
The name of this procedure is experiment.
The name of this procedure is experiment.
the general tab
A Display class in contained in this package as well... org.eclipse.swt.widgets
the Altemeier procedure (also called a proctosigmoidectomy)
A default package is a package with no name. You can create a Java class without putting package name on top of the code. This class is included in the "default package". Be careful not to be confused with java.lang, which is a package that contains Java's fundamental classes and get's imported by default.
N