Want this question answered?
Rips and stains are not considered normal wear and tear on carpet.
No unless the foundation crack was caused by something like an earthquake. Normal wear and tear is not covered.
If you have full coverage on your car then it will cover a windshield crack. Sometime they will claim it as normal wear and tear on a vehicle but if you can prove that it was from vandalism or hail etc then you should covered.
Basically it is wear on all the moving parts.
Not for normal "wear and tear" that resulted in repair or replacement.
No, this is considered normal wear and tear.
scare +++ tear (as in, "wear and tear"!).
yes
Only if required for health or safety reasons, or if they want to make the tenant's stay more pleasant.
NO. Insurance does NOT cover normal wear and tear. Maintenance and upkeep are the homeowner's responsibility.
He can take it out after you leave and he finds that there has been damage beyond normal wear and tear.
Good question: normal wear and tear is what is reasonable for a landlord to expect when the tenant normally uses the rental property. Generally, in four years, if the landlord has not performed certain routine maintenance procedures, that certain items begin to wear: the carpet, for example; painting, and other work that need to be done during the course of normal tenancy. Still, you need to be aware of what is not normal wear and tear, such as damage to appliance, not reporting some maintenance issues that might arise, too many holes in the wall from pictures, etc.; or puncturing the wall and other areas of the property.