0
An argument can be logically valid, but quite demonstrably wrong, because its first premise is false.
How to choose the right starting points is a difficult part, if not impossible...
Who knows which axioms are "correct" ?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
Do all valid arguments have true conclusions?
No, valid arguments can have false conclusions. Validity refers to the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion, ensuring that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. However, the validity of an argument does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, as the premises themselves could be false.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What makes a valid argument invalid?
A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
A fallacious argument uses?
It can use a false proposition to start with or a deduction which is not valid.
What is the difference between a valid fact and a valid argument?
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
Can a valid argument be weak?
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.
What are Truth Validity and Soundness?
Truth refers to a statement that accurately reflects reality, validity refers to a logical relationship between the premises and conclusion in an argument, and soundness refers to an argument that is valid and has true premises.
All valid arguments are sound arguments?
This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.
Are Valid arguments strong or weak?
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you do you think it is more important to be valid or sound?
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
What is the difference between valid and sound argument?
A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. In other words, a sound argument is both valid and has true premises.
