0
What else can I help you with?
Is the argument denying the antecedent valid or invalid?
The argument denying the antecedent is invalid.
Is an argument valid or invalid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
What is the difference between valid and invalid arguments?
A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while an invalid argument is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Is it true that valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
Is the argument denying the antecedent valid or invalid?
The argument denying the antecedent is invalid.
Is an argument valid or invalid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Can an argument be invalid and sound?
No, but it can be unsound and valid.
Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
What is the difference between valid and invalid arguments?
A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while an invalid argument is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
A valid argument can be made invalid if it cotains?
poor wording ???
Are Valid arguments strong or weak?
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
What is the difference between an unsound argument and an invalid argument?
An invalid argument does not make sense logically. The statements in the argument are not connected in a rational way. A sound argument must not only be valid (logically connected) but also based on true premises. Therefore an argument may be unsound because it makes no logical sense, because the premises are flawed, or both.
Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid Some children are energetic Some children are not polite Some polite people are not energetic?
Invalid
What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
That would be a moot point
How would you reply to strongs arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
