answersLogoWhite

0

The argument denying the antecedent is invalid.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is denying the antecedent valid in logic?

No, denying the antecedent is not a valid form of reasoning in logic.


What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?

An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)


Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


What makes a valid argument invalid?

A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.


Can an argument be invalid and sound?

No, but it can be unsound and valid.


Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?

An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.


What is the difference between valid and invalid arguments?

A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while an invalid argument is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


A valid argument can be made invalid if it cotains?

poor wording ???


Are Valid arguments strong or weak?

A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.


Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid Some children are energetic Some children are not polite Some polite people are not energetic?

Invalid


How would you reply to strongs arguments?

No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.


How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?

No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.

Trending Questions
Can you provide examples that illustrate the difference between race and ethnicity? If the second thing i said was a lie and the first thing i said was the truth would you believe me? What are some of Mary Ludwig's quotes? What is omithilogy? Which traditional philosophy advocates the ideals values and truths are universal and eternal and remain the same regardless of how the interpretations of individuals may vary? In her essay Judith Stone believes that people with power should be sent to remote locations around the world to see first-hand who and what they are effecting by being negligent towards the environme? Can you give me irony in a sentence? What is the difference between rationale and logic in decision-making processes? How many people in Philippines? What two dimensions of consumer are creating the appearance of paradox? Have you ever experienced a situation where someone tried to suffocate you with a pillow"? What does it mean when you cry from your right eye first? Is a compass a primary source? What is the thematic topic in twins by Eric wright? What were the 'islands which are many and very large' that Christopher Columbus encountered during his voyages"? When is the best time to plant potatoes under a full moon for optimal growth? Can a man turn into a woman? This is the most common of all mistakes in reasoning This fallacy is based on the confusion between the qualities of the person making a claim in the qualities of the claim itself? Is ignorance a virtue? How are logics metaphysic epistomology and axiology helps to understand the philosophy of education?