A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.
antonym comes from the greek, anti, meaning opposite, so the opposite of weak is strong.
A weak syllable is unstressed. A strong syllable carries the stress.
The opposite of strong is usually "weak." Other anytonyms are frail or feeble. The opposite of a strong smell is a delicate fragrance.
Weak is the antonym (opposite of) the word strong.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
No, not all valid arguments are cogent. A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while a cogent argument is a valid argument with true premises. In other words, cogent arguments are a subset of valid arguments.
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples
No, but all sound arguments are valid arguments. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument where the premises are accepted as true.
Aristotle believed in a balance between logic and emotion. He felt that logic was required for strong and valid arguments. Emotions reinforced logical arguments.
All sound arguments are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound.
it is weak and strong because it neutralises acids. So its strong not weak but weak not strong.