answersLogoWhite

0

Ques: Can a valid argument be weak? Ans: If the valid argument has logic to it, it cannot be weak, it is strong!

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are Valid arguments strong or weak?

A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.


Is it true that valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?

Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.


Is a valid argument strong or weak?

Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.


How would you reply to strongs arguments?

No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.


How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?

No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.


Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?

No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.


Is it possible to have an argument that is weak and uncogent?

An argument that is weak is, by definition, uncogent....


How can you tell if an argument is valid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.


All valid arguments are sound arguments?

No, but all sound arguments are valid arguments. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument where the premises are accepted as true.


When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you do you think it is more important to be valid or sound?

For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.


What is uncogent argument in logic?

An uncogent argument in logic is one that fails to provide valid or sound reasoning to support its conclusion. This can be due to logical fallacies, false premises, or weak evidence. In essence, it is an argument that does not effectively convince or persuade based on logical principles.


What is the difference between valid and sound in a argument?

Valid means that the argument leads to a true conclusion, given that its premises are true, but if an argument is valid that does not necessarily mean the conclusion is correct, as its premises may be wrong. A sound argument, on the other hand, in addition to being valid all of its premises are true and hence its conclusion is also true.